🚚 Order Before 4:00PM MST Monday To Friday For Same Day Shipping! (excl. UPS) Learn more

🚨 The Walksnail Goggles L are back in stock! Order now

Betaflight vs INAV

When flying drones, selecting the right flight controller firmware can significantly impact your flying experience. Two of the most popular options among enthusiasts are Betaflight and INAV. Both platforms offer unique features and capabilities designed to enhance flight performance, but they cater to different flying styles and user preferences.

In this blog post, we will explore the similarities and differences between Betaflight and INAV, helping you understand the strengths and weaknesses of each. Whether you're a competitive racer seeking precision and speed or a casual flyer looking for stability and ease of use, we'll provide insights to guide you in choosing the right firmware for your specific needs.

What is Betaflight?
Betaflight stands as the world's leading multi-rotor flight control software, cherished by both freestyle and racing pilots. The FPV drone racing and freestyle community gravitates towards Betaflight for its outstanding performance, precision, cutting-edge features, reliability, and extensive hardware support. Betaflight is the firmware that runs on your flight controller, managing stabilization and the essential processes required for flight. As the most widely used and supported flight controller firmware, it has earned its reputation in the drone community.


What is INAV?
INAV, like Betaflight, is a flight controller firmware but with a distinct focus. It is particularly aimed at fixed-wing pilots and those seeking smart flying features and automation, all while maintaining user-friendliness. If you are familiar with Betaflight, you will find INAV's layout somewhat recognizable, as it is loosely based on Betaflight's design.


How Are They Similar?
While Betaflight is primarily focused on multi-rotor copters, INAV also accommodates quadcopters with added versatility. Both firmware options feature a form of Return to Home, although INAV's implementation is more advanced and reliable. Additionally, both Betaflight and INAV are compatible with a wide range of flight controllers, though it's worth noting that INAV will cease support for F411-based flight controllers in its next release.

How Are They Different?
The core distinction lies in their focus and capabilities. Betaflight emphasizes tuning and achieving optimal flying characteristics, making it the go-to choice for freestyle drones. On the other hand, while INAV can be utilized for freestyle flying, it may not offer the same ease of tuning. INAV excels with its fully featured options, including Waypoint missions, cruise modes, and various automation capabilities, rendering it ideal for larger quadcopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Furthermore, INAV supports a wider array of sensors, such as airspeed, Lidar, and optical flow, enhancing its versatility for advanced pilot needs.

In conclusion, your choice between Betaflight and INAV should hinge on your flying style and specific requirements. Each firmware offers unique advantages, ensuring that every pilot has the opportunity to find the perfect fit for their flying adventures.